Strategic Selection of Legal Instruments on the U . S . Supreme
نویسندگان
چکیده
can be found at: American Politics Research Additional services and information for http://apr.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Email Alerts: http://apr.sagepub.com/subscriptions Subscriptions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Permissions: http://apr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/35/5/621 SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms): (this article cites 13 articles hosted on the Citations
منابع مشابه
The effective factors on the strategic position of the Supreme Council in the national development of Iran
Objective and Background: The aim of this study is the effective factors on the strategic position of the supreme council in the national development of Iran. The physical and organic aspects of the city and the optimal future development of the country are the fields of study for this research. Methodology: The research method in this research is qualitative and based on the grounded theory. T...
متن کاملThe Obstacles to Religious Education of Fourth Generation of the Islamic Revolution in Iran and Media Solutions to Confront them with Emphasis on the Supreme Leader\'s Statements
The religious education of Iranian teenagers as the fourth generation of the Islamic Revolution is so vital that the Supreme Leader dedicated significant parts of the strategic statement on "The Second Phase of Islamic Revolution" to this section of the society as those who build the future. Considering the undeniable role of the media in forming beliefs and values of the audience in the commun...
متن کاملThe Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?
Public health instruments have been under constant development and renewal for decades. International legal instruments, with their binding character and strength, have a special place in this development. The start of the 21st century saw, in particular, the birth of the first World Health Organization (WHO)-era health treaties – the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) and i...
متن کاملAdopting New International Health Instruments – What Can We Learn From the FCTC?; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”
This Commentary forms a response to Nikogosian’s and Kickbusch’s forward-looking perspective about the legal strength of international health instruments. Building on their arguments, in this commentary we consider what we can learn from the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) for the adoption of new legal international health instruments.
متن کاملJeffrey Segal & Harold Spaeth , The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model
Segal and Spaeth’s The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisisted argues that judges are policymakers who decide cases primarily (and sometimes exclusively) on the basis of their personal policy preferences. This is particularly true of Supreme Court justices, for the American political system leaves them unconstrained when issuing decisions on the merits. Segal and Spaeth label this th...
متن کامل